> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Nick Dokos <ndo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Grant Rettke <g...@wisdomandwonder.com> writes: >> Yikes what a week sorry about that here is what you would need I shall >> be defining a function to provide all such details in the future and >> thanks Nick for addressing: >> >> ╭──── >> │ (setq org-babel-noweb-wrap-start "«") >> │ (setq org-babel-noweb-wrap-end "»") >> ╰──── >> >> > > And an OT question: > > Since on my keyboard I can type << much more easily than I can type «
Totally agreed, I'm using a US QWERTY keyboard. > I was wondering: does your keyboard provide an easy way to type a > guillemet? No but I use the [key-chord] package to do so like this: ╭──── │ (key-chord-define-global "<<" (lambda () (interactive) (insert "«"))) │ (key-chord-define-global ">>" (lambda () (interactive) (insert "»"))) ╰──── It is the same amount of typing but you get the desired character. > Is that why you changed it? Or is it purely aesthetics? Aesthetic personal preferences. After the fact, this preference has proven to be valuable for non-org-users, though. When I use `org' at work and show literate documents to non-users, the guillemet makes it crystal clear that the text is somehow special, and not just "something enclosed by two less-than and greater-than symbols". Not totally sure why people react this way, but they do. [key-chord] https://github.com/emacsmirror/key-chord/blob/master/key-chord.el