Xavier Garrido <garr...@lal.in2p3.fr> writes: > Hi Rasmus, > > Le 10/11/2014 18:37, Rasmus a écrit : >> Hi Xavier, >> >> Xavier Garrido <xavier.garr...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> I'm trying to move to =org-agenda= and I'm converting some of my >>> Google Calendar entries into Org agenda entries. I'm facing an issue >>> with repeated tasks and how to properly stop the event. Consider the >>> following entry : >>> >>> * [Master 1] Nuclear & particle class >>> <2015-01-21 mer. 14:00-16:00 +1w>--<2015-03-22 dim.> >>> >>> For me it means, I will teach every week @ 14:00 to 16:00 until the >>> 22th of March. I am surely doing something bad since the events >>> actually appear every day until the 22th of March. It basically works >>> when I remove the --<2015-03-22 dim.> but then how to stop the >>> repeated tasks. >>> >>> Sorry if the answer is obvious but I have read org-mode manual >>> (http://orgmode.org/manual/Repeated-tasks.html) and other "timestamp" >>> related pages and I didn't find a way to do that. >> >> Did you check `org-class'? Also check >> `org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift'. If you search for the latter you >> will find a recent discussion on what I think is the topic you are >> interested in. >> > > Thanks for the hints, I should have read the FAQ first since my > problem is clearly addressed (here for example > http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html#diary-sexp-in-org-files). In SO > this guy also have the same problem > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2464598/org-mode-schedule-weekly-event-for-a-period
They also point to `org-class` in one of the answers. > I will try to slightly modify the ical2org.awk file from Eric Fraga > http://orgmode.org/worg/code/awk/ical2org.awk to automatically > converts ical file into org and to manage this repeating task. If you want... There are already two functions that were created for this stuff. > I have to say that it is a bit frustrating that the syntax <YYYY-MM-DD > +1w>--<YYYY-MM-DD> is not working because it is pretty simple and > quite elegant. Patch welcome! I can see the syntax being somewhat intuitive, but I think maybe the double use of "--" is confusing. Why not: <YYYY-MM-DD> +1w> until <yyyy-mm-dd> Anyway. . . Cheers, Rasmus -- Bang bang