jenia.iv...@gmail.com (jenia.ivlev) writes: > t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > >> Aloha, >> >> jenia.iv...@gmail.com (jenia.ivlev) writes: >> >>> Also, what if I want to import the actual function defintion into >>> another src block: >>> >>> #+begin_src scheme >>> (+ (my-plus 3 4) 1) >>> #+end_src >>> something here that import the previous function definitions >>> >>> Is that possible? >> >> Yes, see section 14.10 Noweb reference syntax in the manual. >> >> You'll have something that looks like this: >> >> #+header: :noweb yes >> #+begin_src scheme >> <<previous-function-definition>> >> (+ (previous-function 3 4) 1) >> #+end_src >> >> hth, >> Tom > > What do you mean? <<previous-function-definition>> should be replaced > with the actual function definition? But I use babel-mode so that I can > interlace code in a natural language document. I want these src blocks > to be separate. > >
Sorry, it refers to the name of the source code block. ,------------------------------------------------------------------------- | The “noweb” (see <http://www.cs.tufts.edu/~nr/noweb/>) Literate | Programming system allows named blocks of code to be referenced by using | the familiar Noweb syntax: | | <<code-block-name>> `------------------------------------------------------------------------- hth, Tom -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com
