Hi,
Nicolas Goaziou <[email protected]> writes:
> First `org-footnote-section' could be nil, in which case there is no
> headline to look after.
Sure.
> Also, there may be multiple footnote sections in the included document,
> or even some footnote definitions inside and some outside the single
> section...
Multiple footnote sections are supported in the second revision of the
patch...
> You should only extract the definitions associated to the references
> within the included part of the document. However, you cannot insert
> them right after the included text, as it could break the surrounding
> environment, e.g.,
>
> - item
>
> #+INCLUDE: some-table.org
>
> A possible solution would be to somehow postpone insertion of footnotes
> at the very end of the source document, not at the location of the
> keyword. However it would need some testing.
Right, I note something similar in my second post.
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/93299
Clearly the current situation is not satisfactory ("You can use :lines,
but only if no footnotes are present. . . IOW, :lines supports a subset
of Org syntax.").
I prefer converting [fn:N] references to [fn::FOOTNOTE] (see my other
email). Any obvious downsides?
—Rasmus
--
Vote for proprietary math!
