> On Dec 12, 2014, at 5:58 PM, Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:
> However I think the feature implemented is too specific. Instead, > `org-do-sort' could provide a way to pass an arbitrary predicate, > like ?f and ?F in `org-sort-list'. > > WDYT? Actually, when I originally looked at org-do-sort, my first thought was that it should be table driven. But this is my first patch and I’m the new kid so I didn’t want to come in and start tearing down walls. My idea for making it table driven is to add an alist whose elements look something like (prompt-char prompt extraction-function compare-function reverse-compare-function with-case-extraction-function) The alist would be initialized with the built-in options (including the IP address sort) but a user could call add-to-list to add a custom sort to his or her environment. If the list agrees, I will resubmit the patch implementing what I’ve described. As a procedural matter, should I submit it to this thread or add a new one?
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
