Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>> One funny thing I observed was that the following test fails, but only
>> when run via "make test", not from e.g. my "own" Emacs or emacs -q and
>> emacs -q -nw.
>
> I don't see any failing test.
When I use something like the attached patch, "make test" goes from
passing to failing with a fresh Org. Why is it 1 when evaluated from a
text-file?. Or perhaps the Magic Pixies are just angry with me. . .
—Rasmus
PS: I'll fix the test and push it.
--
Not everything that goes around comes back around, you know
>From e1bf99586e8e7484d34a35d24430cf5ab7b66911 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 02:51:15 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] make test break
---
testing/lisp/test-ox.el | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/testing/lisp/test-ox.el b/testing/lisp/test-ox.el
index 8447875..bb57118 100644
--- a/testing/lisp/test-ox.el
+++ b/testing/lisp/test-ox.el
@@ -1027,7 +1027,7 @@ Footnotes[fn:2], foot[fn:test], digit only[3], and [fn:inline:anonymous footnote
(buffer-string))))
;; INCLUDE assigns the relative :minlevel conditional on narrowing.
(should
- (org-test-with-temp-text-in-file
+ (org-test-with-temp-text
(format "* h1\n<point>#+INCLUDE: \"%s/examples/include.org::#ah\"" org-test-dir)
(narrow-to-region (point) (point-max))
(org-export-expand-include-keyword)
--
2.2.1
