Hello,
Rasmus <[email protected]> writes:
> In org.texi, sometimes examples have comments with (·) and sometimes with
> @r{·}. E.g.
>
> @example
> #+TOC: headlines 1 local (insert local TOC, with direct children only)
> @end example
>
> And
>
> @example
> #+INCLUDE: "~/.emacs" :lines "5-10" @r{Include lines 5 to 10, 10
> excluded}
> @end example
>
> Is there any logic behind when @r{·} and when (·) is used?
I don't think so.
> Or should we try to make it more coherent?
IMO @r{.} should be used everywhere in these situations.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
