On 2015-01-23, at 10:56, Karl Voit <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't like proprietary software. I promote open solutions wherever
> I can and accept a more painful living by ignoring comfy proprietary
> solutions.
+1, the same with me. Although I do use some non-free-as-defined-by-FSF
software. (Apparently, to be fully FSF-compliant you shouldn't say
"open". Assuming that you *want* to be FSF-compliant, that is;-). BTW:
from now on I'm going to use the terms: "free-as-defined-by-FSF" and its
negation, because I do not want to borrow terms from an entity whose
philosophy I do oppose.)
> However, I do like to see (maintained) alternatives of MobileOrg and
> I do like to see third party tools using the Org syntax for storing
> and managing information.
+1
> So: Jose, I like what I see on your web page and please do carry on.
^^^^ Neven, not Jose!
> Thanks you for making it clear that your software is not open source
> and please keep on doing this.
+1 again.
> I will probably never use Orgzly by myself because I like open
> solutions. I accept that other people might want to have an
> easy-to-use closed alternative solution to use Org on their phone.
> It's so much better than using Evernote or other cloud-based
> solutions.
I might want to use Orgzly. (I do use Evernote occasionally, btw; yes,
it is terrible.)
BTW, one more question: what about all the emails about dropbox-based
syncing of Emacs config or Org files? Why didn't they get banned? All
are equal, but some are more equal than others?
> Thanks for promoting Org!
+1!
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University
