Hello, Samuel Loury <konubi...@gmail.com> writes:
> I just realized that when creating a new entry in my org-diary > (`org-agenda-add-entry-to-org-agenda-diary-file'), the entry looks like: > > ** test > <2015-01-30 Fri> > :PROPERTIES: > :CREATED: [2015-01-30 Fri 08:00] > :END: > > The property is added by an call to `org-expiry-insert-created' in the > `org-insert-heading-hook'. see in contrib/lisp/org-expiry.el:179 > > With more details: > > In the process in inserting the diary entry, > `org-agenda-add-entry-to-org-agenda-diary-file' > calls (lisp/org-agenda.el:9460) > `org-agenda-insert-diary-as-top-level' (lisp/org-agenda.el:9479). > > The later then calls `org-insert-heading' (calling the org-expiry hook > that creates the property drawer), and inserts the text of the heading > followed by a new line, resulting in the insertion of: Actually, AFAICT, the sole function calling `org-insert-heading' in "org-agenda.el" is `org-agenda-insert-diary-make-new-entry'. I fixed it so it properly puts point on the right spot in the entry. Does it fix your issue? > My opinion is that we should either consider that adding a property in > `org-insert-heading-hook' is a bad practice or change the functions that > create entries to make sure they move beyond a potentially created > properties drawer before adding extra information such as timestamps. > > What is your opinion? If a function calls on `org-insert-heading' and puts point in some position for further processing, it should take into consideration meta-data (i.e., planning info and properties drawer). Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou