Yuri Niyazov <yuri.niya...@gmail.com> writes: > I now think that having the ability to dim to invisible is a feature > mistake. I'm having a difficult time seeing when a user would want to > dim to invisible purely visually, rather than really skipping a > blocked task. There's no visual difference between dimming to > invisible and skipping, but they have subtly different and > non-intuitive differences in behavior. A better fix would be to create > a org-agenda-skip-blocked-tasks setting (which would be implemented > much like other skip settings) and in the docstring in dim to > invisible setting explain the difference and point to the new setting, > and maybe eventually deprecate dim to invisible. > > If you think that is an acceptable direction, I am happy to start > working on a patch.
Sounds good. Please go ahead. Regards,
