Aloha all, I'm having a hard time relating the various syntax proposals to a common, shared goal for Org mode users. This might just be me--I often struggle to understand conversations on the Org mode list. However, I'm also convinced that lack of clearly shared goals really gets in the way of project success. So, because I'd like to see Org mode settle on a citation syntax, I'll risk exposing my limitations by describing what I think a reasonable goal might be and then offer some comments on a recent post.
IIUC, Org mode citation syntax needs to capture four pieces of information for an *individual* citation: a =key= into one or more stores of bibliographic information; a =citation-command= that is understood by the =citation-style= specified for the document; a =pre-note= of arbitrary text in any language; and a =post-note= of arbitrary text in any language. At least, this is how the LaTeX world accommodates the almost unconstrained and ever-growing variability in bibliographic styles in the wild. Note that =key= and =citation-command= are limited for any one document by the keys used in the store of bibliographic information and the commands defined for the citation style. In practice, though, both =key= and =citation-command= are arbitrarily complex, because there are no universal constraints on either the content of keys used by current and future bibliographic information stores, or the commands defined by current and future citation styles. Also, there is no guarantee that the Org mode author created any of the keys and it is likely that the Org mode author did not name any of the citation commands. When I have targeted a specific citation style (typically specified by a publisher) and a particular group of objects to cite, I want Org mode to 1) treat me kindly when I am creating a citation for my document, 2) give me just enough information in the Org mode buffer so I can easily identify the four pieces of information I've entered *without having to do anything except read*, and 3) help me change from one citation command to another when I'm editing. During citation creation I want access to all the keys in the bibliographic store(s), enough information so I can unambiguously identify the object associated with each key, easy access to all the commands defined by the citation style, and no constraints at all on what I can write for the pre-note and post-note. I want this part to be as verbose as possible, but limited to the information that I really need. When I look at the citation in the Org mode buffer I want to 1) see the pre-note and post-note, preferably in the correct relationship to the citation, 2) know what citation command I selected, and 3) know which object I've cited. *I don't want to see the key*; the keys I create myself are long and ugly and those created by others are typically long, ugly, and (for me) often indecipherable. I also don't want to see the citation command, just an indicator that distinguishes among the handful or so possibilities allowed by the citation style and actually used in the document. When I'm rewriting or editing, I often need to change the citation command, usually to switch between, e.g., (Lawrence 2014) and Lawrence (2014). In my current setup this is one of the actions that has its own hot key (I have only a few hot keys because I have a hard time remembering them). Now that I've specified goals, there are a few comments interspersed below. Richard Lawrence <richard.lawre...@berkeley.edu> writes: > Hi John and all, > > On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 1:46 AM, John Kitchin <jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote: >> My only concern is that it remains possible to support this relatively >> full set of citation options on export: >> ... >> which we are currently able to do. I never type any of those in, org-ref >> does it automatically from a key selection tool. I'd rather just see the citation commands associated with a particular citation style. I've been switching from natbib to biblatex over the last few years (natbib at work with my colleagues there, and biblatex for my research documents not associated with work) and I want Org mode to remember which one I'm using, if possible, so I don't have to think about it. > > My original proposal was that we achieve this by allowing splitting > citations into an in-line pointer and out-of-line definition. Since > the out-of-line definition would be a greater element, it could take > #+ATTR_BACKEND properties, which could be used for this, like so: > > The literature is divided on this point. [cite:1] > > #+ATTR_LATEX: :command autocites > [cite:1] For Position A see @Doe99; @Smith99; for Position B see @Foobar87. > This is extremely problematic for me. IIUC, I'd often need to click on [cite:1] to learn what I'd cited and then I'd need to click again to figure out which object was associated with each key. I want to be able to jump directly to the entry in the bibliographic store from the in-text citation, and I want to jump into the bibliographic store only when I want to pick out some specific information from the entry. > What I like about this is that it separates the citation part from the > LaTeX-specific part, and it leverages existing syntax for the > LaTeX-specific part. Something like this seems right to me. I don't think the citation command should be thought of as LaTeX specific, but rather as one of the four pieces of information required to create arbitrarily complex citations in the output. IIUC, it should be possible to generate the required information for any document preparation system from the information potentially supplied by =pre-note=, =post-note=, =citation-command=, and =key=. All the best, Tom -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com
