Vaidheeswaran C <vaidheeswaran.chinnar...@gmail.com> writes: > Allow me to revisit this thread in a week or 10 days so that I can > > 1. take a look at ODF standard. > > 2. dig in to LibreOffice discussion lists to see whether such > instances have ever surfaced (and how they were dealt with). > > Until then, please keep the patch in waiting.
Too late. Having slept over your idea, I think you're right. We should extend footnote export API to provide an alternate order for tree walking, as long as footnote definitions are not ignored. This should now be fixed in master. Of course, if you find something new, we can always make further changes. Thank you. Regards,
