Hello, Nicolas Richard <theonewiththeevill...@yahoo.fr> writes:
> Consider the following line: > > <2015-02-13 ven.> (10h-13h) > > Hiting C-c . RET with point on the timestamp gives > <2015-02-13 ven. -13h> (10h-13h) > > which is not expected. It should now be fixed. > Please consider the patch below Thank you for the patch. However, I applied something different. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou