Marcin Borkowski <mb...@wmi.amu.edu.pl> writes:
> Hi there,
>
> I don't want to be nitpicking, but I'm just curious. I'm looking at the
> function `org-split-string'. It uses (two times) the following
> construction:
>
> (setq list (cons (something) list))
>
> Is there any particular reason for not using `push' there?
These days you even have split-string in subr which you can make behave
like org-split-string.
Oh, and there's all the cl re-implementations... I like org-some better
than cl-some just cause it sounds nice when you say it (try):
org (tiny pause) some.
—Rasmus
--
When in doubt, do it!
