On Friday 06 March 2015 11:51 PM, Richard Lawrence wrote:
> Hi Vaidheeswaran,
>
> Vaidheeswaran C <vaidheeswaran.chinnar...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I got the subject and also text wrong. (But I hope my intention was
>> clear.) I am really looking for EXISTING in-text CSL styles.
>
> Rasmus pointed you to a relevant style:
>
> https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/blob/master/chicago-author-date.csl
>
> I think you might be mixing up two different distinctions. A
> "parenthetical style" like this one is distinguished from, say, a
> numeric style (like the ACM styles, I think). This distinction between
> "parenthetical" and numeric styles applies to the document as a whole.
>
> This distinction is orthogonal to the distinction between whether
> *individual citations* are parenthetical (like "(Auth 2000)") or in-text
> (like "Auth (2000)").
>
> So there is not really any such thing as an "in-text CSL style".
> Rather, there are CSL styles that support both in-text and parenthetical
> citations (which is most of them, I'd guess).
Your guess is just a guess. You haven't looked at chicago-author-date
style, have you?
You can prove yourself right by
(a) producing an "off-the-shelf" CSL file that uses BOTH "in-text" AND
"parenthetical" citations.
(b) producing a csl-based tool that ORG CAN INTERFACE WITH that
produces "in-text" AND "parenthetical" styles.
