Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> writes: > Keywords are akin to small headings to identify the contents of a > document. I see no reason to restrict this to the reader of the > electronic version of a document.
What are you talking about? I don't want to restrict anything: AFAIU, the feature you propose already exists in another form. Again, your proposal is to have KEYWORDS mix two different things, i.e., set meta-data in document's header and set contents in the document. My opinion is that for a given topic, you probably don't always want the same contents, e.g., in "\\hyperref{pdfkeywords={...}}" and at the beginning of the document, if only for the limitations on the syntax allowed in the former. Therefore, we may consider keeping the two features separated. Do you think that you /always/ want "pdfkeywords" to hold exactly the same contents as what you could put in your document? Do you think that a user who wants to fill pdfkeywords will always want to also add these contents in the body of the document? Regards,