Hi all, Sebastien Vauban <sva-n...@mygooglest.com> writes: > Robert Klein wrote: >> On 03/24/2015 10:04 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote: >> >>> Can't we say that a COMMENT'ed subtree is like having all of its >>> contents commented, line by line? IOW, nothing "accessible"? >> >> This would probably break a lot of babel stuff. > > Could you elaborate why? > >> If there was an option to disable exports for #+NAME:-ed stuff (i.e. >> data sources for babel), e.g. somtehing like >> >> #+NAME: xyzzy :exports none >> | munich | 13 | >> | cologne | 12 | >> >> you could deprecate and eventually disable data sources in COMMENT-ed >> section. > > If you *not to export* some stuff in a subtree, adding the "noexport" > tag would be enough, right? > > Best regards, > Seb
FWIW, I agree that COMMENT should be equivalent to individual line # . Sections that should be accessible without being exported get the :noexport: tag. Is there any usecase for COMMENTed sections that is not covered by :noexport:? Regards, Andreas
