Fabrice Niessen <fni-news-TA4HMoP+1wHrZ44/dzw...@public.gmane.org> writes:
> Could that be stated clearly in the output? You should ask to whom implemented Worg. > The thing is that I did not touch those links, as you can see in my > commit. So, somehow, Org became more strict. And the fact that that file > wasn't modified for some time means it wasn't re-exported for the same > period; hence, the problem was never found -- until someone modifies > whatever in the file... Correct. > IOW, shouldn't all files be published each time, to spot such problems > as soon as they become problems (because of syntax changes, for > example), instead of being much later, whenever the file is changed (if > it ever is)? So you get 50-100 files to fix instead of the one you modified? IMO, it would be a waste to re-publish unmodified files. You only have to consider syntax changes when updating a file. > OK, I'll see whether it can help. Note that you need to have a very recent Org (less than 7 hours) to use it. Regards,