Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> writes: > Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> Point is moved, though. If narrow shouldn't be "broken" then point > shouldn't be moved. I.e. no move when the definition is not within the > buffer. Fixed in 5954f6aa25b51a3a9a8f258fb0f15ef51be31366. Thank you. >> Outside of the most trivial case (i.e., jump back and forth between the >> definition and one of its references) it sounds like it would quickly >> get in the way. > > It would only work for the most trivial case I guess. This is why it is not worth implementing. Regards,
