Hello, Titus von der Malsburg <malsb...@posteo.de> writes:
> Capturing, refiling, and archiving all create a new entry at a target > location. Yet each of these facilities has it’s own way to specify the > target. Capture templates have the most powerful target specification > and refiling and archiving are both fairly limited. For users that is > confusing and it prevents them from getting the most out of org-mode. Is > there a technical reason for why different target specifications are > used or is it just historical? Wouldn’t it make sense to use just one > target specification “language” and to use that everywhere? Would you mind elaborating? What, exactly, are you suggesting? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
