Rainer M Krug <rai...@krugs.de> writes: > OK - this makes sense. But instead of jumping to the next line, a > splitting of the header into two would make more sense, keeping the > correct syntax.
That is literally what my patch does IF you are in region four (more or less) of org-complex-heading-regexp. > Jumping to the next line is actually counter intuitive, as this is pure > movement. It's what it does in tables (most of the time). What would be better? —Rasmus -- However beautiful the theory, you should occasionally look at the evidence