Yes, thanks, the :session did the trick. Is that documented somewhere? Also, it ignored my running MIT Scheme and fired up a Guile REPL in the next buffer. I guess it's doing something with Geiser, hence, Guile?
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Nick Dokos <ndo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Lawrence Bottorff <borg...@gmail.com> writes: > > > The MIT scheme repl is running in the next buffer. . . > > > > Did you try it? > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > #+BEGIN_SRC scheme :session foo > (define (mydouble x) > (+ x x)) > #+END_SRC > > #+RESULTS: > > doesn't seem to remember from one block to the next. So, after defining > the code above > > #+BEGIN_SRC scheme :session foo > (mydouble 5) > #+END_SRC > > #+RESULTS: > : 10 > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > Without the session, I get > > #+RESULTS > : An error occurred. > > instead. This is with guile as the scheme interpreter, but that should > not make any difference. > > > > On May 28, 2015 2:16 PM, "Nick Dokos" <ndo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Lawrence Bottorff <borg...@gmail.com> writes: > > > > > . . . installed geiser via elpa -- and got some functionality. > Although a simple thing like > > > > > > #+BEGIN_SRC scheme > > > (define (mydouble x) > > > (+ x x)) > > > #+END_SRC > > > > > > doesn't seem to remember from one block to the next. So, after > defining the code above > > > > > > #+BEGIN_SRC scheme > > > (mydouble 5) > > > #+END_SRC > > > > > > gives an error, while > > > > > > #+BEGIN_SRC scheme > > > (define (mysquare x) > > > (* x x)) > > > (mysquare 5) > > > #+END_SRC > > > > > > #+RESULTS: > > > : 25 > > > > > > works. Any way to have it remember like a REPL does? > > > > Use a session? > > Nick > > >
