On Saturday 30 May 2015 01:49 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Vaidheeswaran C <vaidheeswaran.chinnar...@gmail.com> writes: > >> > A canonical DESCRIPTION is NOT available. (YET) The ANCHOR should >> > still get through to the `texi' file, right? > We can replace a silly behaviour with another silly one, yes. But is > there any non-silly one?
Displaying a silly link is a call for an action (to fix). So, from fixability perspective, having a silly anchor is better than pruning it from output. >> > This is the output I see in other backends (that support anchors). >> > >> > HTML: >> > >> > <p> >> > Jump to <a href="#orgtarget1">No description for this link</a>. >> > </p> > The example above is a bit misleading because a description is not > mandatory. In your situation, Option "num:t" would be sufficient to > produce something. I understand that the error is in the OPTIONs that I have and I need to fix the Org file. Your argument is sound. (BUT) Having some feedback that something is amisss is always desirable. >> > LaTeX: >> > >> > Jump to \ref{orgtarget1}. > If you look at it, this will not appear in the (PDF) output as there's > nothing to refer to, much like what happens in ox-texinfo. I see a red box (which is an urgent call for action). > In any case, what exactly do you suggest in this situation, i.e., what > should be displayed? How about @ref{orgtarget1}? ---------------------------------------------------------------- ps: I can send in fixes. I have a copyright assignment. WDYT?