Rainer M Krug <rai...@krugs.de> writes: > Ah. That explains.I think it would be quite useful to add this to the > info section of org-use-property-inheritance.
Patch welcome. > I agree - and I like the name "accumulation properties" or "aggregation > properties". Ditto. Any improvement to documentation is welcome. FWIW, I prefer the latter. > So there is no way at the moment to define a property in lower level > and then overwrite it in a higher level? It might be only me, but I > think that would be quite a useful addition. Could you provide a simple example of what you have in mind? Regards,
