Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: > Which one are you talking about, the one from ELPA or the one I suggest > adding to core? > > The former doesn't translate to Markdown at all. It simply calls pandoc > on an Org document to produce something else. It depends on how well > pandoc's Org importer behaves, i.e, how much Org syntax it does support.
Why do we need a pandoc exporter? And why do we need it in core? There's already quite a few backends to work on when we want to improve the general exporter framework. By all means, I'm not against a pandoc exporter, I'm just trying to understand the reasoning. Note: my distro doesn't have a binary pandoc package so I have never tried it. Rasmus -- Evidence suggests Snowden used a powerful tool called monospaced fonts