Envoyé de mon iPhone
> Le 2 juil. 2015 à 20:21, Sebastien Vauban <sva-n...@mygooglest.com> a écrit : > > Aaron Ecay <aarone...@gmail.com> writes: >>> which adds to header-args, what is missing is >>> >>> ,---- >>> | :header-args-: noweb >>> `---- >>> >>> which would remove the "noweb yes" from the header arguments >> >> This is not possible with the old syntax either, though: >> >> * One >> :PROPERTIES: >> :noweb: yes >> :END: >> >> ** Two >> :PROPERTIES: >> ??????? >> :END: >> >> #+begin_src emacs-lisp >> ... >> #+end_src >> >> There’s nothing you can put in the ?s at heading Two to get rid of the >> noweb property inherited from One. (Unless you have something in mind >> which I’m not thinking of.) > > Quickly, just on that particular point: what you'd put there would be > the "toggle" of the property (here ":noweb: no"), but that's of course > sort of limited to boolean values which have an explicit "no" (or "nil") > value; so I admit I just cover this particular exemple. But this was possible with the old syntax, but not with the new one - right? > > Best regards, > Seb > > -- > Sebastien Vauban > >