Hello, Gregor Zattler <telegr...@gmx.net> writes:
> There are only two commits which mention the timeline in their > summry lines in the newer git history since 2008-01-31. > > Shouldn't the feature then be officially depreciated and > mentioned as stale in the manual? The manual mentions the > timeline in most cases together with the agenda. And there is a > small chapter dedicated to the timeline. > > If depreciation of the timeline is OK I would patch the manual > accordingly. I'm all for it. I think we shouldn't even document deprecated features in the manual, otherwise, they just never go away. In any case, Bastien will have the last word on the matter. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
