Luc Teirlinck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bill Wohler wrote: > > Also, why does the same code work in Emacs 21 and not in Emacs 22? > > I believe that I answered this in an earlier reply, but maybe you had > not yet read that reply when you asked this.
Yes, that is correct. I liked your proposal to revert to Emacs 21 semantics. This would also fix the problem with the two broken MH-E hooks which, as far as I can tell, shouldn't be broken (although I might be confused about how require works ;-). (Who knows how many other hooks are broken in the same way.) If Gerd is listening, perhaps he can let us know why he added that defvar: revision 1.2 date: 2003/07/23 00:00:13; author: gm; state: Exp; lines: +5 -1 branches: 1.2.2; (define-derived-mode): Mention hook in doc string. Defvar the derived hook. Maybe someone familiar with that code can take it out... -- Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian! If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane. _______________________________________________ Emacs-pretest-bug mailing list Emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug