"Richard M. Stallman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I appreciate your work.
I'm afraid I couldn't have guessed so, and experimentally I couldn't get fixes made, even being thick-skinned about the response. > If you send a useful and clear bug fix, we > will certainly use it. I can't be any clearer than saying that you need to treat the sections I mentioned like .sdata in unexelf and copy the stack-marking definitions from irix6-0.h to irix6-5.h. > At times when we want new features, we would > be glad accept them from you too (assuming we like the features). The last time I offered a TODO item, the story was there was a feature freeze, but all sorts of features were going in from others. Anyway, I would rather that features I wrote several years ago looked like getting released someday. It badly needs a feature freeze to stabilize it and get a release made. I'm actually surprised people can work on improvements when you continually have to address regressions. > Did you send a patch for this that we neglected? I don't want to send a patch since I've been banned from working on free software on lab systems even in my own time, and I wouldn't want contributions to be in question even though I was addressing something affecting users. I'll be out of work soon, but I won't have the proprietary systems available then. However the changes are trivial to make. I since noticed the unexec ones are even in TODO. _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
