>     Looks like it works indeed, although it breaks my code because my code
>     relies on lexical-let which doesn't work correctly when the lambdas are
>     built at run time as is the case in your code.

>     So maybe I'll be better off with the current code.  Hmm....

> I can install my fix, or I can leave it out, but I can't do both at once.

Too bad you're only a saint, eh?

> The function as changed this way seems to be more capable and better,
> which seems to suggest I should install my fix.

Agreed.

> Can you fix your code to work with the function's new capability?

That's what I'm about to try,


        Stefan


_______________________________________________
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug

Reply via email to