> > Do users ever enter them? > > I can't imagine a situation where users might want to enter them. > > In that case, there is no reason to keep them. > > Since `toc' pertains to the Current Info file, it makes no sense > for that to be treated like a file of any kind. If anything, > it is more like a virtual node. It could have a node name > such as :toc: which can't really appear in an Info file.
Supporting virtual nodes looks like a new feature. Are you sure this is necessary for the next release? > A phony node nane is not logically ideal for the history, > but maybe it would work. Do you mean a history node with references to nodes visited only in the current manual? As a user, I certainly wouldn't like this. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/ _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
