Luc Teirlinck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I now realize that *desktop* is not a file visiting buffer, so it does > not matter if people mess it up. Thus one can indeed just disable > undo rather than applying the patch I proposed. But that user visible > *desktop* buffer is confusing, especially if the user also has a > buffer visiting his desktop-base-file-name, since the two buffers are > identical. Is there any reason not to rename "*desktop*" to > " *desktop" (with a leading space) and kill it after it is written to > disk? Is there any reason to keep this buffer hanging around > consuming some memory and being user visible?
Thanks, Luc. This exact thought coursed through my mind. Would Mr. Desktop please chime in? -- Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian! If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane. _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
