In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > AFAIK, only when TEXT is requested, an selection owner can > > choose the returning type from STRING, COMPOUND_TEXT, or > > UTF8_STRING. When UTF8_STRING is requested, we should > > return it or return nothing. > Also IIRC a perfectly valid utf-8 buffer may contain eight-bit-* chars, use > to keep track of valid unicode chars that have no corresponding character in > emacs-mule. So the presence of eight-bit-* chars does not imply that the > utf-8 encoded form of the text will contain an invalid utf-8 byte sequence. Yes, but such eight-bit-* chars can be detected by checking `untranslated-utf-8' property. > > And, if Emacs owns a unibyte string, perhaps the right thing > > is to make it multibyte according to the current > > lang. env. (by string-make-multibyte) at first, then encode > > it by utf-8. > That sounds terribly fragile/buggy. Then, what do you think Emacs should do in such a case? --- Kenichi Handa [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
