Kenichi Handa wrote: > The files who have copyright year before 1997 were released > every year as part of Mule package.
Ok. Sorry for the lecture you did not need, then. > They are integrated into Emacs in 1997. And Emacs were released in > 1997, 1998, and 1999. So, perhaps I didn't have to add the year > 2000, but I thought that having that year was not harmful. And > actually most files are modified in 2000 too. I _think_ it does not matter if the files were modified that year, if those modifications were not released that year (though I agree with you that this is not a huge issue). The current maintain.texi does not seem to make it clear what rules apply if you are not using a public repository, as in 2000. _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
