On 12/17/06, Kim F. Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Another way is the following one which does exactly the same as your patch, but in a more generic way:
That is what I proposed on http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-pretest-bug/2006-12/msg00395.html so obviously I agree it's a good answer ;-) /L/e/k/t/u _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
