> Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 10:34:55 +0100
> From: Lennart Borgman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Part of the trouble in this special case seems to be a mistake in the 
> specification from the beginning. Keyboard language and UI language were 
> treated as the same thing which they obviously not are for very many 
> computer users.

What are the manifestations of the UI language, besides the keyboard
input language?

> In ms last update in this area I can see they are getting still a
> bit closer to reality.

No, they just introduced a few more functions whose functionality
overlaps the old ones, and this whole mess is so badly documented that
it's impossible to understand how each language is chosen and by whom,
and what is the right language to use in each situation.


_______________________________________________
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug

Reply via email to