> Cc: Francesco Potorti` <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,  [email protected]
> From: Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 09:53:07 -0500
> 
> > I think I fixed these now in the CVS, please take a look.
> 
> It's just a bad workaround

What's bad about it?

> The warning may come back with additional optimizations in gcc

Are you saying that the warnings we saw (before my changes) would not
appear under -O0?

> The problem is gcc's, really.

True; but I don't see any practical way of talking GCC developers out
of this attitude.  And I dislike bogus warnings, because tolerance to
them makes it easy to miss real warnings.  So we are stuck with these
half-measures, for now.


_______________________________________________
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug

Reply via email to