Hi Fredrik, Hey, I had the same idea about a week ago and implemented it in elisp.
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (defun th-display-buffer (buffer force-other-window) "If BUFFER is visible, select it. If it's not visible and there's only one window, split the current window and select BUFFER in the new window. If the current window (before the split) is more than 165 columns wide, split horizontally, else split vertically. If the current buffer contains more than one window, select BUFFER in the least recently used window. This function returns the window which holds BUFFER. FORCE-OTHER-WINDOW is ignored." (or (get-buffer-window buffer) (if (one-window-p) (let ((new-win (if (> (window-width) 165) (split-window-horizontally) (split-window-vertically)))) (set-window-buffer new-win buffer) new-win) (let ((new-win (get-lru-window))) (set-window-buffer new-win buffer) new-win)))) (setq display-buffer-function 'th-display-buffer) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- But my function doesn't behave exactly like a "horizontalized" `display-buffer', because it will always split if there's only one window and never reuse the current window. That makes a difference for e.g. `M-x info'. I like this difference, but I was very surprised that there is no standard way to tell emacs that I prefer horizontal splitting. In times where most new computers have wide-screen displays your patch should really be considered for inclusion, best before the release of Emacs 22. Bye, Tassilo -- The glass is neither half-full nor half-empty: it's twice as big as it needs to be. _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug