Juanma Barranquero wrote:
On 3/26/07, LENNART BORGMAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you have ClearType on?
Yes
Does it happen also with ClearType off? (I think you could've tried
this without me asking it ;-)
Ehum, no. I thought there was no use in trying that, but no, it does not
happen with ClearType off.
So now I have some reasons having ClearType on and at least one having
it off ;-|
but it still may be a problem with the KVM switch again.
Do you mean this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KVM_switch?
Yes.
Just checked on another display and I do not see that problem
there. (However later is w2k and the one where I see the
problem is XP.)
So you didn't really check on "another display", but another computer
setup... And AFAIK, W2K does not support ClearType.
Yes, a totally different setup. No ClearType, no KVM, w2k.
Does it happen with the stock CVS Emacs too? Five months ago I
committed a patch from Ben North that could be related (Ben's patch
definitely fixed a problem with bold faces in ClearType-enabled
Windows, BTW).
Yes, it happens with the stock CVS Emacs too. (I always - tbh nearly -
with the stock CVS Emacs first. Even if I see no reason that there
should be any difference.)
2006-10-27 Ben North <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (tiny change)
* w32term.c (x_draw_glyph_string_foreground): Set background mode
to TRANSPARENT before using overstrike to simulate bold faces.
* xfaces.c (best_matching_font): Fix logic to decide whether to
use overstriking to simulate bold-face (it was reversed).
CVS Emacs from 2007-03-21.
_______________________________________________
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
