Hi, Simon, Chong! I've got this problem nailed, I think.
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 10:17:54AM +0100, Marshall, Simon wrote: > To give context, the change was to stop this overwriting-mis-fontification: > case foo: > ^^^ not fontified (generally used to be fontified as a > label/constant) > ^^^^ fontified as a label/constant (used to be fontified as a keyword) > With the change, "case" remains fontified as a keyword. > Superficially, it would seem my change would prevent goto labels from being > fontified. That might be true, given my lack of understanding of the new > cc-mode fontification engine. However, it looks like it might be some > interaction with jit-lock mode, since if font-lock-support-mode is nil, then > fontification is OK. (This is presumably why M-o M-o also fontifies > correctly.) > So I'm tempted to say it's not (simply) due to my change. Stefan, Alan, any > pointers? [From the original poster.] > > > The `retry:' label is not highlighted. It is fontified correctly by > > > `M-o M-o' though. I'm not sure I believe this. I can't reproduce it. I'm coding up a fix at the moment. The idea is to get `c-forward-label' to indicate in its return code what sort of "label" it's moved over. "label" here means just about anything with a colon in it apart from a bitfield specifier in a struct (something like int foo : 2, meaning foo is -2 .. 1). It can also be things like "@private" in Objective-C. `c-font-lock-declarations' will then only fontify a goto-label or a case-label. Give me a day or two! > Simon. -- Alan. _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
