>>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kenichi Handa wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> If people have doubts that changing that syntax table is generally >> correct, what about the previous patch that alters just the >> particular function? > At the moment, I don't have a time to study the code and his > patch. So, I can't doubt nor be sure on anything. > But, in general, I think we can treat all non-ASCII > characters as the same way in a mail address. And, if > mail-extr.el utilizes a syntax table to parse a mail > address, I think setting all non-ASCII characters to the > same syntax (in the current case, word) is the right thing. > So, my suggestion it to do that and see if it works well if > no one can investigate the code and RFC-822. The way I posted, to make the syntax of all non-ASCII characters `word', has a weakness. It is not effective to charsets that are created after loading mail-extr.el. Regards, _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
