Charles Karney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The right solution would be to move the rcp hooks up the Emacs calling
> chain. This would allow the safe save to be implemented as
>
> copy REMOTE:FILE to REMOTE:#TMP#0
> rsync BUFFER REMOTE:#TMP#0 # potential rsync efficiencies here
> mv REMOTE:#TMP#0 REMOTE:FILE
That would be a nifty idea. I'm wondering if anybody else is doing
stuff like this, so you all could lobby Kyle to do it...
I admit that I'm not sure at all about doing the cache thing. It's
not clear to me when the cache should be invalidated.
kai
--
Life is hard and then you die.
