Pete Forman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Kai Gro�johann writes:
> > Pete Forman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Most versons of ls work for me, but I do have an older machine
> > > running ISC 4.0 (Interactive Unix) which does not handle -1. How
> > > much of a problem is it to parse the results of ls with a
> > > whitespace separator rather than newline?
> >
> > So, should I be doing `ls | cat', instead? What do you think?
>
> That should work.
I have now changed it so that it does `ls | cat' where appropriate. I
hope I didn't miss anything.
Also, I presume that `cat' will be found in one of the standard
places, as of rcp-remote-path.
kai
--
Life is hard and then you die.
