- Emacs 21 is coming up which might mean quite a few changes.
Should I split in two branches, or should I try to support all
Emacsen in one branch?
It would be nice to have everything together. But if keeping everything
together adds too much code (more than, say, 5% of code), rms will want
to remove that for inclusion in emacs 21.
- Should there be a stable and a development branch, where the
stable branch gets only bug fixes whereas the development branch
gets the new features? (I don't see lots of new features right
now, though. But there's still the todo list at the end of
rcp.el...)
That would be nice, but I think it is premature. There are too few
rcp.el users right now, and adding an unstable branch would reduce the
testing community to few people. When rcp.el will become part of emacs,
the version distributed with emacs will be the stable one.
