Kai Gro�johann writes:
> When the remote shell has come up, I intend to send some command to
> the remote end, then have MULE analyze the output to set the
> process output coding system. Does that sound reasonable?
>
> I think doing `ls -l /' should be fairly safe. This might contain
> dates in the local language and it contains plenty of newlines, so
> there should be sufficient material for MULE to intuit the right
> coding system.
I thought we were trying to cut down on traffic. Wouldn't something
like "echo foo; echo bar" be adequate.
--
Pete Forman | Disclaimer: This posting is originated by
Western Geophysical | myself and does not represent the opinion
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | of Baker Hughes or its divisions.
