Emanuel Berg <in...@dataswamp.org> writes: > joakim wrote: > >>>> Gnus refreshes slowly, maybe that could be helped with >>>> concurrency, but it could also be helped with more async >>>> work in gnus. >>> >>> Concurrency can help you keep reading messages while Gnus >>> refreshes in parallel, but it won't easily help you refresh >>> faster, unless someone comes up with a way of collecting >>> the update in parallel chunks (in which case they should be >>> able to do that today with the emacs-async package, >>> I think). >> >> Yes, one of these days I should really try one of the >> gnus-async hacks. > > I've heard many times that Gnus is slow, but never > experienced it. I have 6 servers and 26 groups.
About 700 groups, a mix of nnimap, and nntp. nnimap is slowest. But its not all that slow, and Thunderbird would be equally slow I think, and thunderbird doesnt come close organizing all thouse groups, thats why i stay with gnus. > > How many do people have, for it to get slow? > > Or is it slow for some other reason? -- Joakim Verona joa...@verona.se
