This discussion isn't even tangent to Emacs anymore. It has diverged and reached an orbit around Mars and US domestic politics.
On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 at 18:53, Van Ly via Emacs news and miscellaneous discussions outside the scope of other Emacs mailing lists < [email protected]> wrote: > > Jean Louis <[email protected]> writes: > > Assuming the compute workload required over a 24 > >> month journey span is 1x serial and 9x parallel, a 4x cluster of > >> > >> - 4x Nvidia DGX Spark for parallel > >> - 1x something else in the form factor for serial > >> > >> radiation hardened is enough for the first attempt. WDYT? > > > > I don't. I think is waste. I think all that money could be used to give > to people who are really lacking food and who are under the depopulation > agenda strategy. > > > > That money isn't a lot, knowing there are governments, such as, Uganda, > France, Russia and China, that are more inefficient than USA. The DOGE > says, in the USA, a political actor will start an NGO with $100, and all of > a sudden, $2 billion will be stripped from the one government fund through > fraud and waste to keep feeding it. Or, what must be a $10 thousand survey > on government recreational park services, is actually billed at > $2 billion. And, no further processing or followup action is done on the > information collected in the survey. > > In fewer than 400 words, what does your preferred LLM model say, about the > depopulation agenda starvation strategy, you see and want to prevent, as > having higher priority than Starship going to Mars in 12 months? I haven't > come across this idea ,at all. > > -- > vl > > --- > via emacs-tangents mailing list ( > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-tangents) >
--- via emacs-tangents mailing list (https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-tangents)
