I have just been looking at muse's publishing of latex footnotes. It
looks as though footnotes are always rendered as \footnotemark{<mark>}
and \footnotetext{<text>}. The usual latex style is to use
\footnote{<text>}, and to have latex work out the number/mark for
itself. So using \footnotemark/text looks a bit unnatural to the LaTeX
user.
It also makes it impossible to specify in the preamble such things as
per-page rather than per-document footnote numbering.
I suggest that footnotemark and footnotetextend be set to "" in
muse-latex-markup-strings [or removed if it works that way too].
There are instances in latex when one might want to have
footnotemark/text [in figures, tables, etc., and in minipages], but I
can't see anything in muse-latex that would generate broken latex
footnote code if this change were to be implemented.
Sorry for the flurry of muse and latex related posts!
--
Jim Ottaway
_______________________________________________
emacs-wiki-discuss mailing list
emacs-wiki-discuss@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-wiki-discuss
