Phillip Lord <Phillip.Lord <at> newcastle.ac.uk> writes: > I'm a little confused by the multiple options available for > schedules and calendars.
Hi Phillip, I aggree with you it seems there are so many alternatives for doing similar things that it is not easy to decide which way to go. Should one: - go for the Emacs' diary feature and make use of Planner-Diary in order to store entries in the "* Diary" section? - just make use of one "* Schedule" section? - work with cal-desk-calendar? - or rather with planner-appt? with task-based or schedule-based appointments? Besides, what are the pros and cons in using the regular Emacs' diary or planner-cyclic? Did anyone already write a set of guidelines about which way to go and why? I would very much like to have a look at it. Before using Planner I relied on a regular diary. Now I've switched to planner-cyclic along with planner-appt in the "* Schedule" section, but I'm still confused about whether I am missing features that would be available if I were using regular diaries. Cheers, -- René _______________________________________________ emacs-wiki-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-wiki-discuss
