On Jan 23, 2010, at 6:56 AM, marc hoffman wrote: > Brent, > >> All good points. But one way to think about this: does multiple main windows >> *have* to be in there for a successful 1.0? Could it be considered for 1.1 >> or 2.0 instead? > > definitely, yes. > > but consider this: assuming the proper design and abstraction between data > and view, allowing to open multiple instances of the same main window should, > quite literally, be a question of exposing the option to do so, or not. it > should not be any significant development work to provide the feature.
There's been enough pull for multiple main windows that it seem inevitable that they should be included in a 1.x/2.0 release. Is it a case of implementing it for 1.0 but disabling it (i.e. only testing single main window), and then debugging multiple windows later? Seems this thread needs to migrate to letters-dev and get more developers chiming in regarding the "easiest path" to get to multiple windows. Regards, Boone
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list List help: http://lists.ranchero.com/listinfo.cgi/email-init-ranchero.com
